Resource · IFRS 16
Most groups see IFRS 16 (the standard on lease contracts) as a set of accounting entries to be automated once and for all. Yet the real issue is not the entry: it is judgement. The standard brings leases onto the lessee's balance sheet, as a right-of-use asset on the asset side and a lease liability on the liability side, but it is the lease term chosen, the discount rate, contract modifications and impairment that drive the figure. On the lessor side, the model remains dual: finance lease or operating lease. You are not running a mechanism, you are documenting decisions.
Updated June 2026

IFRS 16 is the international accounting standard governing lease contracts. It applies to any contract granting the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time, in exchange for consideration. The first question is not an accounting one but a qualifying one: is this contract a lease or a service?
IFRS 16 deals with contracts that convey the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time, in exchange for consideration. The first question is therefore not an accounting one but a qualifying one: is the contract a lease or simply a service?
To conclude that a lease exists, three conditions must be met:
For the lessee, the general model requires recognising on the balance sheet a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. The standard provides limited exemptions for short-term contracts and certain low-value assets, which must remain defensible and must not be applied too broadly.
Under IFRS 16, the lessee recognises on the balance sheet a lease liability equal to the present value of the lease payments, then a right-of-use asset (the ROU, the right-of-use asset reflecting the right to occupy the leased item) derived from that liability. In the income statement, the rental expense gives way to depreciation and interest expense.
The lessee mechanics rest on two linked balance sheet items:
When the interest rate implicit in the contract is not available, the lessee uses its incremental borrowing rate (IBR). This rate is specific to the contract: it must reflect a term, a security, an amount and an economic environment similar to those of the right-of-use asset. A flat, unadjusted corporate rate is often insufficient.
The local presentation of rent disappears, in whole or in part, in favour of two distinct expenses:
In principle, there is no direct impact in OCI (other comprehensive income, the items of income and expense recognised in equity outside net profit). The lease term, decisive for the calculation, depends on the options reasonably certain to be exercised or not. This is a sensitive point: one month of misjudged option shifts the liability.
On the lessor side, IFRS 16 keeps a dual model, close to the former IAS 17 standard: each contract is classified as a finance lease or an operating lease, depending on whether or not the lessor transfers substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset. The classification is set at inception and is only revised in the event of a contract modification.
Unlike the lessee, the lessor has not seen any upheaval: the standard keeps a dual model. Each contract is classified as a finance lease or an operating lease. The substantive criterion is the transfer, or not, of substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership. The classification is made at inception and is revised only in the event of a contract modification.
In a sublease, an intermediate lessor classifies the sublease by reference to the right-of-use asset arising from the head lease, and not by reference to the underlying asset.
Under IFRS 16, the difficulties do not lie in the accounting entry, but in the judgements: the lease term and renewal options, the incremental borrowing rate, contract modifications, the impairment of the right-of-use asset. These are the trade-offs that must be tracked and documented.
For cancellable or renewable leases, you must first determine the enforceable period, then apply the "reasonably certain" tests to the options. Non-recoverable fit-outs (leasehold improvements) interact with the term and are analysed together.
The IBR is a rate specific to the contract: it reflects a similar term, security, amount and economic environment. An unadjusted corporate rate is often insufficient.
IFRS 16 explicitly requires applying IAS 36. If the right-of-use asset does not generate largely independent cash flows, the test is performed at the level of the CGU (cash-generating unit, the smallest group of assets producing independent cash flows), with a symmetrical treatment of the lease liability in the numerator and the denominator of the test.
IFRS 16 brings leases onto the lessee's balance sheet and shifts the rental expense within the income statement. This mechanically improves EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortisation), since rent leaves operating expenses, and it changes ratios, the cash flow statement, the information system and the notes. As many points to secure before the closing.
IFRS 16 also interacts with IAS 12 (the standard on income taxes: deferred tax impacts), IFRS 9 (security deposits, renegotiations) and IFRS 15 (the standard on revenue: mixed contracts, subleases).
An IFRS 16 project starts with an inventory of contracts by asset family, then with a memo documenting the key judgements (qualification, term, rate, exemptions) before building the calculation. The challenge is not to produce a figure quickly, but to lay down a defensible audit trail. Do not confuse a high-level diagnostic with a robust measurement.
Common risks to avoid: concluding too quickly that there is no lease, applying the low-value exemption too broadly, under-documenting the term chosen, forgetting service components, and mixing a high-level diagnostic with a robust measurement.
Largely, yes. The lessee general model requires recognising a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet. Only limited exemptions remain for short-term contracts and certain low-value assets, which must stay defensible.
In the absence of an available implicit rate, the incremental borrowing rate (IBR) is used, specific to the contract: it must reflect a similar term, security, amount and economic environment. An unadjusted corporate rate is often insufficient.
You first determine the enforceable period of the contract, then apply the "reasonably certain" tests to the options. Non-recoverable fit-outs must be analysed together, as they can influence the term chosen.
Yes. IFRS 16 explicitly requires applying IAS 36 to the right-of-use asset. If it does not generate largely independent cash flows, the test is performed at the CGU level, with a symmetrical treatment of the lease liability.
Little. IFRS 16 keeps a dual model close to the former IAS 17: classification as a finance or operating lease according to the transfer of risks and rewards.
A single concession may call for two treatments: IFRS 9 for the receivable already recognised, and IFRS 16 for the future payments, treated as a contract modification.
Scope your priorities with a consolidation and IFRS expert.